ok, Green or Huard?

[Primusgod]

Evidently there are only three or four of us that still frequent this site, but I respect your opinions. Do we go with Damon or Trent? I would think Green is the better talent, might actually improve the play of the team, and can do more with what we have. But the big question comes in the team chemistry. Do we take that chance and replace him? He's the second best QB in the league right now. I am reminded of Grbac and Gannon. We should have stuck with Gannon in 97 or 98 or 96, whenever it was. Green hasn't had a chance to do anything in this offense and we dont know what he can bring to the table. So what do you think? I say we ride this horse till it drops. We can bring Green in later if Huard falls apart. But will he fall apart looking over his shoulder, afraid to make one mistake he may make many. What do you think?

[lazarus]

push Trent back as long as you can ...

"the docs say he just isn't ready yet" *nudge,nudge ... wink,wink*


until Huard has a bad game ...... like all QB's have sooner or later.


Trent jumps to the rescue and it gives you all sort of excuse to do whatever you need to do later.


i imagine the chiefs hope that Brodie Croyle is the long term solution .... not Green or Huard.